CALL TANK SERVICE TODAY
713-665-3001

US truckers: Container lines retain too much control over chassis

Source: JOC.com  LONG BEACH, California — Drayage operators say container lines’ continuing influence over chassis lowers efficiency at ports and is an obstacle to the creation of truck appointment systems at marine terminals.

“The ocean carriers are out of the chassis business, but they’re still in it,” said Gerard J. Coyle, vice president of Philadelphia-based Evans Delivery, during a panel discussion at JOC’s 16th annual TPM Conference.

During the last several years, container lines have transferred an estimated 90 percent of their U.S. chassis to leasing companies or other entities, in an effort to cut costs. However, ocean carriers continue to specify which lessor’s chassis must be used for “door moves” arranged as a bundled service under carrier-haulage terms.

“It’s frustrating,” said Ken Kellaway, CEO of RoadLink IntermodaLogistics. “Steamship lines continue to provide chassis in many of their contracts to anybody that has any volume, and we are therefore prevented from providing our own chassis for those moves.”

If the ocean carrier’s specified lessor has no chassis available at a terminal or depot, a drayage operator must supply its own chassis or take one from a different provider — and then try to persuade the ocean carrier to pay for the substitute equipment.

“They have to make the decision: Do I eat the cost of that chassis, or do I wait until there is a chassis available that I can use?” said Weston LaBar, executive director of the Harbor Truckers Association at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach.

If a container’s free storage time at the terminal is about to expire, a trucker may have no choice but to supply or rent its own chassis in order to avoid a demurrage penalty for late pickup of the box.

When ocean carriers carriers divested most of their chassis in the U.S., many of the sale agreements contained provisions to ensure that the ship line would still have access to chassis and that lessors would have a market for their newly acquired equipment.

These chassis-use provisions were expected to be short-lived, but now that seems to be less certain. A large percentage of intermodal moves still are booked under carrier-haulage terms that require a trucker to use a specific lessor’s equipment or risk having to swallow the cost.

Source: JOC.com – Read More on the Journal of Commerce’s website about how the trucking industry is dealing with the container chassis shortage.

Image: Port of Long Beach

]]>

Scroll to Top